Fix footnote bodies

edited/08.markdown

@@ -168,46 +168,46 @@ actual suits in which this kind of oppression is practised; but we are
 to include all those cases in which the fear of such oppression is used
 as a weapon to compel men into a surrender of their rights.
 
-[Footnote 99: _2 Sullivan Lectures_, 234-5. _3 Blackstone_, 274-5, 376.
-Sullivan says that both plaintiffs and defendants were liable to
-amercement. Blackstone speaks of plaintiffs being liable, without saying
-whether defendants were so or not. What the rule really was I do not
-know. There would seem to be some reason in allowing defendants to
-defend themselves, _at their own charges_, without exposing themselves
-to amercement in case of failure.]
+[^99]: _2 Sullivan Lectures_, 234-5. _3 Blackstone_, 274-5, 376.
+    Sullivan says that both plaintiffs and defendants were liable to
+    amercement. Blackstone speaks of plaintiffs being liable, without saying
+    whether defendants were so or not. What the rule really was I do not
+    know. There would seem to be some reason in allowing defendants to
+    defend themselves, _at their own charges_, without exposing themselves
+    to amercement in case of failure.
 
-[Footnote 100: When any other witnesses than freeholders were required
-in a civil suit, I am not aware of the manner in which their attendance
-was procured; but it was doubtless done at the expense either of the
-state or of the witnesses themselves. And it was doubtless the same in
-criminal cases.]
+[^100]: When any other witnesses than freeholders were required
+    in a civil suit, I am not aware of the manner in which their attendance
+    was procured; but it was doubtless done at the expense either of the
+    state or of the witnesses themselves. And it was doubtless the same in
+    criminal cases.
 
-[Footnote 101: “All claims were established in the first stage by the
-oath of the plaintiff, except when otherwise specially directed by the
-law. The oath, by which any claim was supported, was called the
-fore-oath, or ‘Præjuramentum,’ and it was the foundation of his suit.
-One of the cases which did not require this initiatory confirmation, was
-when cattle could be tracked into another man’s land, and then the
-foot-mark stood for the fore-oath.”—_2 Palgrave’s Rise and Progress_,
-&c., 114.]
+[^101]: “All claims were established in the first stage by the
+    oath of the plaintiff, except when otherwise specially directed by the
+    law. The oath, by which any claim was supported, was called the
+    fore-oath, or ‘Præjuramentum,’ and it was the foundation of his suit.
+    One of the cases which did not require this initiatory confirmation, was
+    when cattle could be tracked into another man’s land, and then the
+    foot-mark stood for the fore-oath.”—_2 Palgrave’s Rise and Progress_,
+    &c., 114.
 
-[Footnote 102: Among the necessary expenses of suits, should be reckoned
-reasonable compensation to counsel, for they are nearly or quite as
-important to the administration of justice, as are judges, jurors, or
-witnesses; and the universal practice of employing them, both on the
-part of governments and of private persons, shows that their importance
-is generally understood. As a mere matter of economy, too, it would be
-wise for the government to pay them, rather than they should not be
-employed; because they collect and arrange the testimony and the law
-beforehand, so as to be able to present the whole case to the court and
-jury intelligibly, and in a short space of time. Whereas, if they were
-not employed, the court and jury would be under the necessity either of
-spending much more time than now in the investigation of causes, or of
-despatching them in haste, and with little regard to justice. They would
-be very likely to do the latter, thus defeating the whole object of the
-people in establishing courts.
-
-To prevent the abuse of this right, it should perhaps be left
-discretionary with the jury in each case to determine whether the
-counsel should receive any pay—and, if any, how much—from the
-government.]
+[^102]: Among the necessary expenses of suits, should be reckoned
+    reasonable compensation to counsel, for they are nearly or quite as
+    important to the administration of justice, as are judges, jurors, or
+    witnesses; and the universal practice of employing them, both on the
+    part of governments and of private persons, shows that their importance
+    is generally understood. As a mere matter of economy, too, it would be
+    wise for the government to pay them, rather than they should not be
+    employed; because they collect and arrange the testimony and the law
+    beforehand, so as to be able to present the whole case to the court and
+    jury intelligibly, and in a short space of time. Whereas, if they were
+    not employed, the court and jury would be under the necessity either of
+    spending much more time than now in the investigation of causes, or of
+    despatching them in haste, and with little regard to justice. They would
+    be very likely to do the latter, thus defeating the whole object of the
+    people in establishing courts.
+    
+    To prevent the abuse of this right, it should perhaps be left
+    discretionary with the jury in each case to determine whether the
+    counsel should receive any pay—and, if any, how much—from the
+    government.